Skip to content

Conversation

@avallete
Copy link
Member

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Outilned by #1027 we could use some canary test of the python types, just to ensure the produced result is in fact a valid Python file at runtime.

This PR introduce a test script to check just that.

@avallete avallete requested a review from soedirgo as a code owner December 11, 2025 12:53
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 11, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 20140565650

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.04%) to 83.905%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 20133475492: 0.04%
Covered Lines: 6256
Relevant Lines: 7341

💛 - Coveralls

@avallete avallete merged commit 185eac0 into master Dec 12, 2025
6 checks passed
@avallete avallete deleted the chore/add-python-types-runtime-canary-check branch December 12, 2025 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants